I'm writing a Halloween-timed story for a real estate industry publication on how agents handle stigmatized homes today: properties tied to a murder, suicide, notorious former owner, or alleged haunting. The conventional wisdom is that these homes sell at a steep discount, but the evidence is mixed, and I want to test whether today's affordability-constrained market is shrinking that discount.
I'm looking for licensed real estate agents and brokers who have listed or sold a stigmatized property in the past few years, appraisers with experience valuing them, and real estate attorneys familiar with state disclosure rules.
Helpful responses will address one or more of the following:
- How was the home priced, and how did the final sale price and days on market compare with similar homes nearby?
- Did the stigma's type (violent crime vs. natural death vs. ghost stories) or how long ago it happened make a difference?
- What did you disclose, and did you go beyond what your state requires? How did you handle buyer questions at showings?
- Did any thrill-seeking buyers want the home because of its history, or did they see the stigma purely as a chance at a bargain?
- Have lookup tools like DiedInHouse.com changed how you approach disclosure?
- For attorneys: What are the biggest legal risks for agents and sellers, and where do state rules differ most?
Please include specific examples (location, approximate timing, price outcome) wherever you can; anonymized details are fine.
Requirements: Must be a licensed real estate agent or broker, a certified appraiser, or a practicing real estate attorney. Please include your full name, title, brokerage or firm, and the state(s) where you practice. No pitches for products or services, please.
Deadline: Oct 13th, 2026 11:59 PM (May close early)
This deadline has passed, and new answer submissions are no longer being accepted.